Add 32" length inseam; 33 and 34 waist sizes

Comments: 6

Oldest • Newest • Most likes • Fewest likes

• Add a comment
• 20 Jul, '23
  Kermit

  Well, add a 29" inseam and a 31" waist. Read that to be more variety in the smaller sizes. Those of us in smaller sizes don't change in shape much, much more compact so the size range does not change all the time and not much left to compress with a belt.

  Copy link to this comment
• 11 Jul, '24
  Gary E

  Longer inseam, I'm 6'4", not a fan of the shorter inseams, "tall/long" inseams please.

  Copy link to this comment
• 13 Sep, '24
  Andy B

  I would love to be able to get a pair of joggers. I'm 6'2" and have a 34" inseam. There is no way a 28" inseam will work. I believe a lot of sweatpants that have a tall option, the inseam is around 32.5". I understand not having a large selection of inseam lengths, but have a 32/33" would be appreciated by a large number of people. I haven't looked at the womens side but I know a few women who need to have a tall option for tops and bottoms.

  Copy link to this comment
• 21 Mar, '25
  Cheryl

  32” -34” inseams aren’t that long. Please include them

  Copy link to this comment
• 08 May, '25
  alice@wooland.com System

  "Add 32x34 pants size" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2025-05-06), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 19 Feb
  HG

  Hi!
  
  I want to get the Stretch Tech Chino Trouser and in Cedarwood but see you don't have them in 32x34?! Why is this? I think it is not that uncommon that there are taller men but without bigger bellies ;)
  
  Am 185 cm and weigh 76 kg. Bigger waist than 32 is usually way too big and shorter than 34 in legs is usually too short. Many thanks in advance!

  Copy link to this comment