More Fits in Pants

Comments: 7

Oldest • Newest • Most likes • Fewest likes

• Add a comment
• 20 Jul, '23
  Mark

  Highlighted comment
  
  Thanks for producing pants. Some of us are built a bit different than slim people and need more room in the seat and thighs. Athletic fit would be good or pleats. Please continue sizing up to 40 waist also. Thanks.

  Copy link to this comment
• 23 Sep, '25
  Mac Bishop Admin Pinned

  We have straight and slim fits, but we don't currently have both fits in one style. That will change in November with a restock of our Stretch Canvas 5 Pocket Pant in both fits.

  Copy link to this comment
• 20 Jul, '23
  Jacob

  I have a pair of the Castlerock pants 34x34. They are snug in the thighs, and loose on my waist. I would love to see a relaxed fit or an athletic fit option.

  Copy link to this comment
• 21 Jul, '23
  S

  Yes! Pants with bigger thighs for guys with strong legs.

  Copy link to this comment
• 03 Mar, '25
  Blaine

  As a cyclist with large thighs I pretty much require an athletic fit on all my pants.
  
  Athletic taper would be great!

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 21 Dec, '25
  RC

  Would love this as well! The Stretch Canvas 5 Pocket Pant slim is still quite baggy with limited waist/inseam combinations. The rise is very high, and the pockets are 2-3x too deep.
  
  A skinny, low-rise cut with regular size pockets would be ideal. For reference, the Scotch & Soda Skim in 36x32 fits me perfectly: https://scotchandsoda.com/products/essentials-skim-skinny-jeans-classic-blue-178966-410-classic-blue?variant=48317002973471

  Copy link to this comment
• 19 Feb
  HG

  Hi!
  
  I want to get the Stretch Tech Chino Trouser and in Cedarwood but see you don't have them in 32x34?! Why is this? I think it is not that uncommon that there are taller men but without bigger bellies ;)
  
  Am 185 cm and weigh 76 kg. Bigger waist than 32 is usually way too big and shorter than 34 in legs is usually too short. Many thanks in advance!

  Copy link to this comment